TEAM International vs Cleveroad: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
TEAM International (4.0/5) edges ahead of Cleveroad (3.8/5) overall. TEAM International is the better choice for american buyers wanting a US legal entity plus offshore engineering reach. Cleveroad is the stronger option for buyers who want general-purpose delivery from a Western-facing office. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
TEAM International vs Cleveroad: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | TEAM International | Cleveroad |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2004 | 2011 |
| HQ | Lake Mary, Florida, USA (first international R&D center in Kharkiv, Ukraine) | New York, USA / Manchester, UK (Kharkiv delivery center) |
| Team size | 1,000+ | 150–300 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A US headquarters paired with development capacity spread across seven countries, Ukraine included | No single named specialty, which itself signals broad general-purpose engineering capacity |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and staff-augmentation engagements | Fixed-project and dedicated-team engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, React | React, React Native, Node.js |
| Industries served | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare | Retail, Logistics, Healthcare |
TEAM International vs Cleveroad: overview
TEAM International
Kharkiv was where TEAM International opened its first international development hub, not long after the company's own 2004 founding in Lake Mary, Florida. It has since grown to more than 1,000 developers across the US, Ukraine, Poland, Colombia, Portugal, Mexico, and Argentina, giving buyers a nearshore/offshore blend rather than Ukraine-only delivery. That spread is a real continuity advantage, but it also means Ukraine is one development location among several rather than the company's sole base.
Cleveroad
Cleveroad doesn't lead with a single named technical specialty; its 2011-founded team builds general custom software and mobile apps for startups and mid-size businesses from offices in New York, Los Angeles, Manchester, and a Kharkiv development center. That absence of a niche focus is itself useful information: a buyer gets broad, general-purpose delivery capacity and a Western commercial contact point instead of a boutique's narrow expertise. Case studies span web and mobile work across several industries rather than concentrating on one.
Services and capabilities: TEAM International vs Cleveroad
| Capability | TEAM International | Cleveroad |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| AI/ML development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated development teams | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: TEAM International vs Cleveroad
| Framework / platform | TEAM International | Cleveroad |
|---|---|---|
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: TEAM International vs Cleveroad
| Criterion | TEAM International | Cleveroad |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Staff augmentation, Dedicated team, Fixed project | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: TEAM International vs Cleveroad
| Dimension | TEAM International | Cleveroad |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare | Retail, Logistics, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A US company wanting a domestic legal entity while accessing Ukraine-based engineers., A buyer wanting development risk spread across multiple nearshore and offshore countries. | A startup wanting a US or UK commercial point of contact alongside Ukraine-based development., A mid-market business needing general web or mobile software. |
| Typical project type | Staff augmentation | Fixed project |
TEAM International vs Cleveroad: pros and cons
| TEAM International | |
|---|---|
| + | US-headquartered legal entity simplifies contracting for American buyers. |
| + | Development capacity spread across seven countries reduces single-region risk. |
| + | Kharkiv was its founding international hub, giving genuine multi-decade Ukraine experience. |
| - | Ukraine is one of several development countries rather than the company's exclusive base |
| - | Multi-country structure adds coordination overhead versus a single-office studio |
| Cleveroad | |
|---|---|
| + | Multiple commercial offices in the US and UK give buyers a choice of contracting entity. |
| + | Mid-size team suited to startup and mid-market project scale. |
| + | Over a decade of continuous operation since 2011. |
| - | General-purpose positioning without a clearly named technical specialization |
| - | Kharkiv is one of several offices rather than the company's sole development base |
Who should choose TEAM International?
A typical fit: a US company wanting a domestic legal entity while accessing Ukraine-based engineers.
A US headquarters paired with development capacity spread across seven countries, Ukraine included. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Healthcare.
Who should choose Cleveroad?
A typical fit: a startup wanting a US or UK commercial point of contact alongside Ukraine-based development.
No single named specialty, which itself signals broad general-purpose engineering capacity. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Logistics, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: TEAM International vs Cleveroad
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | TEAM International |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | TEAM International |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: TEAM International (Not published) vs Cleveroad (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | TEAM International |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | TEAM International |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: TEAM International vs Cleveroad
| Use case | TEAM International fit | Cleveroad fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A US company wanting a domestic legal entity while accessing Ukraine-based engineers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting development risk spread across multiple nearshore and offshore countries. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A startup wanting a US or UK commercial point of contact alongside Ukraine-based development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A mid-market business needing general web or mobile software. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: TEAM International vs Cleveroad
TEAM International (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Ukrainian Software Development projects. A US headquarters paired with development capacity spread across seven countries, Ukraine included.
Cleveroad (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need a mid-market business needing general web or mobile software. If your situation matches that, Cleveroad is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
TEAM International vs Cleveroad FAQ
Is TEAM International better than Cleveroad?
TEAM International (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. TEAM International's strongest advantage: US-headquartered legal entity simplifies contracting for American buyers. Cleveroad's strongest advantage: multiple commercial offices in the US and UK give buyers a choice of contracting entity.
How do TEAM International and Cleveroad differ in pricing?
TEAM International uses dedicated-team and staff-augmentation engagements pricing. Cleveroad uses fixed-project and dedicated-team engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: TEAM International or Cleveroad?
Cleveroad is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between TEAM International and Cleveroad?
TEAM International's primary differentiator is: a US headquarters paired with development capacity spread across seven countries, Ukraine included. Cleveroad's primary differentiator is: no single named specialty, which itself signals broad general-purpose engineering capacity. They also differ in team size (1,000+ vs 150–300 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Retail vs Retail, Logistics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.